Decision to teach kids to be ‘gay’ allowed to stand

FROM WND

By Bob Unruh

‘This despicable ruling not of the people, nor for the people, but against the people’

A federal court decision approving mandatory public school instruction for children as young as kindergarten in how to be homosexual is being allowed to stand, drawing a description of “despicable” from the parent who unsuccessfully challenged his school district’s “gay” advocacy agenda.


Estabrook Elementary

The U.S. Supreme Court without comment has refused to intervene in a case prompted by the actions of officials at Estabrook Elementary school in Lexington, Mass., who not only were teaching homosexuality to young children, but specifically refused to allow Christian parents to opt their children out of the indoctrination.

The case on which WND has reported previously involves Massachusetts father David Parker, who with his wife now have withdrawn their children from public schools, for which they continue to pay taxes, and are homeschooling.

The decision by the Supreme Court leaves standing the ruling from the appeals court for Massachusetts, where Judge Sandra Lynch said those who are concerned over such civil rights violations “may seek recourse to the normal political processes for change in the town and state.”

Earlier District Judge Mark Wolf had ordered that school officials’ work to undermine Christian beliefs and teach homosexuality is needed to prepare children for citizenship, and if parents don’t like it they can elect a different school committee or homeschool their children.

According to a new report from MassResistance, a pro-family organization following the case, the dispute was over the “Lexington Schools’ aggressive policy of normalizing homosexual behavior to elementary school children and not allowing parents to be notified before or after, or being able to opt-out their kids from it.”

The dispute grabbed headlines when Parker, on April 27, 2005, “was arrested and thrown in jail by school officials over his insistence on being notified regarding his son in kindergarten being taught about homosexual relationships by adults,” Mass Resistance reported.

Another family was alarmed by a similar situation a short time later as the school not only continued its indoctrination, but “became more hostile to the Parkers, and local liberals and homosexual activists did their best to harass the family,” Mass Resistance reported.

In fact, the school, led by Supt. Paul Ash, then stated in school publications they would not “compromise” on any points regarding the homosexual agenda.

“The [Supreme] court did not even bother to notify the Parkers or their attorneys,” said Mass Resistance, which said what now will be enforced in the judicial district will be the lower bench rulings that the state has not only the right but “even the obligation … to promote homosexual relationships to young children.”

“The unrelenting action of the Lexington schools to push homosexuality in the lower grades, as well as the ugly hostility of local liberals toward the Parkers and their children over this incident has taken its toll,” Mass Resistance said. “This year the Parkers removed both of their children from the Estabrook Elementary School and have been homeschooling.”

Parker gave no indication, however, he was quitting the overall battle against rampant normalization of homosexuality.

“The federal Supreme Court of the United States has tragically decided to deny our case from moving forward,” Parker said in a statement. “We have exhausted all our legal options in the federal system for the protection of young children in the public schools. The Supreme Court has cowardly turned their backs on a parental rights issue that clearly has national significance with profound consequences.

“We believe that parents have the right and sacred responsibility to defend the psyches of their young impressionable children against such child predation. This includes more forceful measures to defend against, the inculcation and penetration, of perversion into their minds, behind the parent’s back and against their will,” Parker said.

“This despicable ruling is not of the people, nor for the people, and nor by the people – but against them. We, the people, must take back our government for the sake of our children and the sake of this nation,” he said.

When Parker asked the Supreme Court for a review he noted the questions raised in the case have not been answered in previous cases. Those include: “Whether objecting parents have a constitutional right to opt their public school children out of, or even to receive notice of, undisputed government efforts to indoctrinate kindergarten, first and second grade school children into the propriety, indeed desirability, of same gender marriage.”

Also at issue is whether those schools’ “open and specific intention to indoctrinate … children into disbelieving core tenets of their families’ deeply held religious faith constitutes a burden on the families’ free exercise of religion.”

The high court previously found, the request argued, the “primary role of the parents in the upbringing of their children is now established beyond debate as an enduring American tradition. Aspects of child rearing protected from unnecessary intrusion by the government include the inculcation of moral standards, religious beliefs, and elements of good citizenship.”

In an earlier interview with WND, Parker warned allowing the appeals ruling to stand would “allow teachers in elementary schools to influence children into any views they wanted to, behind the backs of parents, to a captive audience, and against the will of the parents if need be.

“Teachers are being postured to have a constitutional right to coercively indoctrinate little children [into whatever they choose to teach,]” he noted.

Del.icio.us : , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Zooomr : , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Technorati : , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Flickr : , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Advertisements

3 comments on “Decision to teach kids to be ‘gay’ allowed to stand

  1. Are you for real? No one is teaching kids to be gay. Gay is not a choice. People want to teach children not to HATE gay people, just as we shouldn’t HATE anyone….(color of skin, gender, nationality, etc.) Let me guess, your white, overweight, and not too educated? Am I correct? I also like your disclaimer, BAD comments will be deleted, so I doubt this will be posted…but I should tell you, your article is BAD! I also am curious about something. “Christian” organizations have raise over $50 million just to ban gay marriage in California, again taking away a right from equal, tax paying citizens. How many hungry could $50 million feed? How many homeless could $50 million house? How much disease could $50 million cure? And more so, if Jesus had $ 50 million, what would he do with it?

  2. Dear James,

    You are very wrong when you say that we Christians are not handsome…I work as a model but I believe in God….I work with the hottest people in town but I don’t invovle myself with any immoral activities,,,
    We don’t hate the Gays but we are trying to warn others the consequences if all the world become Gay then the human race will be extinct…a small wild fire can turn into a full fledged fire and uncontrollbale..

    We are not going to sit here like before…we are going to fight even if it will cost billions of dollar….its only a fraction of what we spend for the poor…

    I am a very rich person,,I own a yatch and I am planning to buy a personal jet…

    Roberts

  3. LOL,

    If all the world becomes gay? Please, educate yourself. Gay is not a choice. So go buy your jet, or get on your yatch…..or do you mean yacht, and drift away.

    What does it say in the bible about a rich man’s odds of getting into heaven?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s