‘Gay’ marriage battle goes to kindergarten

FROM WND

Voters worry education mandates may reinforce homosexual agenda

autumnsky-subcontent-image.gif

A pamphlet set to be distributed by the California secretary of state warns voters that if they do not pass Proposition 8 in November to constitutionally define marriage between one man and one woman, thay will face an unexpected consequence: children as young as kindergarten will be subject to mandatory teaching on the virtues of homosexual marriage.

Opponents of Proposition 8 are calling the education argument a smokescreen, a scare tactic and a fabrication.

Supporters, however, are saying it addresses a reality Californians will face if voters don’t stand up and insist on a constitutional, traditional definition of marriage.

Randy Thomasson, president of Campaign for Children and Families, told WND, “New California laws are pushing sex education further and further into younger grades, and school districts that provide sex education are mandated by law to teach children to honor marriage. Without Proposition 8 school children in the younger grades will definitely be taught to honor homosexual marriage between two men or two women as married role models.”

Attorney Shannon Minter, who represented same-sex couples in the California Supreme Court case that struck down the state’s ban on same-sex marriage, told the San Francisco Chronicle, “This is pure fabrication. They are trying to inflame people by making up these falsehoods about kids.”

Jennifer Kerns, a spokesperson for a Proposition 8 support coalition called ProtectMarriage.com, however, pointed WND to the specific section of California law mandating instruction on marriage in schools.

“The California Education Code clearly states that schools would be required to provide instruction to children as young as kindergartners that same-sex marriage is the same as traditional marriage,” Kerns told WND. “The code specifically states that the legal and financial aspects and responsibilities of marriage must be taught.”

The voter guide, written by supporters and opponents of Proposition 8, citing arguments both for and against, will be printed and delivered to California residents’ homes, barring any court ordered changes to the final wording, but is posted currently for public inspection before mailing.

The education argument, written by proponents of Proposition 8 in the official voter guide, states, “The narrow decision of the California Supreme Court isn’t just about ‘live and let live.’ In health education classes, state law requires teachers to instruct children as young as kindergarteners about marriage. … If the gay marriage ruling is not overturned TEACHERS WILL BE REQUIRED to teach young children there is no difference between gay marriage and traditional marriage.

“We should not accept a court decision that results in public schools teaching our kids that gay marriage is okay. That is an issue for parents to discuss with their children according to their own values and beliefs. It shouldn’t be forced on us against our will” (all emphasis in the original).

The official rebuttal, published in the same voter guide, calls the education argument “scare tactics” and “a smokescreen,” arguing that Proposition 8 doesn’t have anything to do with education.

According to the Chronicle, opponents of Proposition 8 are now considering whether or not to sue over the issue, the only legal way an official ballot argument can be changed before an election.

As WND reported earlier, supporters of homosexual marriage had sued to block Proposition 8 from being on the ballot at all, but were defeated.

Proposition 8, if passed, would effectively overturn the May 15 California Supreme Court decision striking down the state’s ban on same-sex marriage by adding the words “only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California” to the state’s constitution.

Del.icio.us : , , , , ,
Zooomr : , , , , ,
Technorati : , , , , ,
Flickr : , , , , ,

Advertisements

7 comments on “‘Gay’ marriage battle goes to kindergarten

  1. Please note:

    The state Department of Education disagrees with that interpretation of the law, a spokeswoman said last week. In Tuesday’s suit, opponents of Prop. 8 said state law doesn’t require instruction about marriage at any grade level and mandates only a health education program that may include, sometime before high school graduation, a discussion of the legal and financial consequences of marriage.

    The suit also noted that state law allows parents to remove their children from health classes that offend the parents’ religious or moral beliefs. “It is simply false, therefore, to state that the state Supreme Court’s decision on marriage will result in any instruction given against the will of any parent,” said attorney Karen Getman in the court filing.

    source:

    http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/07/29/BASO121RRI.DTL&tsp=1

  2. Now that you-know-what is well under way in you-know-which place, you-know-who’s should be informed that engines like Google now have “God to Same-Sexers: Hurry Up.”

    (This is Lou and I just approved of this PC message.)

  3. Hi, Lou. I’ve seen that a few times in the past week, and I will ask the sam question I’ve always asked. When did you stop being a Christian? As that hate filled screed has none of the teachings of Christ in it.

  4. This is what a kindergarten teacher has to say:” One day you will want to get married. When you do, just know there are laws that talk about marriage and you need to know what they say.” And the law is fulfilled. This nonsensical comment that anyone has to be taught about differnt types of marriage is crazy. Marriage is marriage. No one has to be taught that there are mixed and same gender marriages any more than anyone has to be taught that there are mixed and same color marriages. Why a need to incite fear? Fear and unhappiness is all this crowd seems to be about.

  5. Proposition 8 is a ridiculous and needless bill that only serves to inscribe permanent bigotry into the constitution of a state that is becoming increasingly tolerant and loving. It would be a black mark on our bright and sunny future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s