Blog Archives
Brazilian Supreme Court Rules that Sex With Children Not a Crime
LIFESITENEWS
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman, Latin America Correspondent
SAO PAULO, June 7, 2009
The Brazilian Supreme Court and a lower appeals court have nullified two sentences against child sex abusers in recent months on the grounds that their behavior did not constitute a crime under Brazilian law, sparking a protest from the United Nations.
On June 23, Brazil’s Superior Tribunal of Justice (the nation’s Supreme Court for cases not involving Constitutional law) upheld the acquittal of several men who had paid two girls, 12 and 13 years of age, to have sexual intercourse with them, on the grounds that prostitution was not covered by child sex abuse statutes.
The men, one of whom has been identified as a Brazilian sports celebrity, reportedly took photos of the encounter.
Although the fact that the men engaged in sexual intercourse with the girls was apparently not in doubt, the Tribunal of Justice of the state of Mato Grosso do Sul had ruled that it was not a crime, because the girls were engaged in prostitution. Brazil’s Superior Tribunal agreed, upholding the lower court ruling.
“The prostitutes waited for the client in the street, and are no longer people who enjoy a good image in society,” the judge ruled in the original case, adding that “prostitution is such an old profession and is considered to be barely a moral abuse, but never a crime subject to penalty.”
Ariel de Castro Alves, a member of Brazil’s National Council for the Rights of Children and Adolescents, expressed horror at the ruling.
“The decision is almost a license for abuse and exploitation to be committed without punishment. Currently, cases like these are difficult to punish,” she told the Brazilian newspaper O Globo. “It is a difficult process, that involves impediments, and very often, threats against the victims and their families. When punishment is possible, we have an absurd decision like this.”
The decision is also being denounced by the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF).
“As incredible as it may seem, the argument used is that the accused did not commit a crime, because the children had been sexually exploited before by other people,” the organization commented in a public statement.
“Moreover, the decision causes indignation, because of the insensitivity of the judiciary regarding the circumstance of vulnerability to which the girls are subject,” the statement continued. “The case also establishes a dangerous precedent: that sexual exploitation is acceptable when it is paid for, as if our children are for sale in the perverse market of adult power.”
In a second case, reported in Brazil on June 5 by legal commentator Renato Pacca, an appeals court in the state of Rio Grande do Sul overturned the conviction of a 30-year-old man who admitted that he had had anal sex with his 13-year-old brother.
According to the prosecutor, the accused, who has not been named in the Brazilian media, “through real and presumed violence, forced his three minor brothers who were 9, 12, and 13 years of age, to practice various libidinous acts of sexual intercourse during the time period in question, consisting in showing them pornographic films, submitting them to various sexual services, and practicing anal coitus.”
Although the accused confessed to molesting his 13-year-old brother, and although he was sentenced to 12 years in prison, he was absolved on appeal to the Fifth Criminal Chamber of the state’s Tribunal of Justice because the child had “requested it.”
According to the text of the judgment, “sexual promiscuity was the tonic of domestic life, and this reality is sufficiently attested by the natural way the topic was confronted by the supposed victims.”
The 13 year old “effectively consented to have sexual relations with his brother” the court said, by “sitting on the lap of his brother, arguing that ‘I knew that was wrong’ and that, in the act, he had the role of the woman and the accused the role of the man.”
Prosecutors appealed the case to the Supreme Tribunal of Justice, which, in contrast to the other, similar case regarding the two girls, overturned the appeals court ruling and restored the original sentence.
Contact Information:
Embassy of Brazil in the USA
3006 Massachusetts Avenue, NW
Washington, DC
20008-3634
Phone: (202) 238-2700
Fax: (202) 238-2827
Email: ambassador@brasilemb.org
Embassy of Brazil in Canada
450 Wilbrod Street
Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6M8
Phone: (613) 237-1090 or (613) 755-5160
Fax: (613) 237-6144
E-mail: mailbox@brasembottawa.org
Embassy of Brazil in the United Kingdom
32 Green Street
London W1K 7AT
Phone: 020 73999000
Fax: 020 73999100
Email: info@brazil.org.uk
Embassies of Brazil to other Nations: http://www.embassyworld.com/embassy/Brazil/Brazil_1/
Did Michael Jackson repent, accept Christ?
FROM WND
Pop idol reached out to Gospel star Andrae Crouch before death

Gospel superstar Andrae Crouch and his twin sister, Sandra, confirm meeting with Michael Jackson and praying and singing with him weeks before his death.
Jackson, raised as a member of the Jehovah’s Witness sect and reportedly a convert to Islam last year, sought out the Crouches for inspiration for his upcoming tour, for which he was unprepared, according to a report in Assist News Service.
But while some blogs have reported that meeting led to a spiritual conversion by Jackson, the Crouches say they are not certain.
“Not sure where that came from,” said Sandra Crouch on her Facebook page. “We loved and respected Michael and will continue to pray for his family. All the extra is not from us.”
A spokesman for the Crouches had this to add: “Andrae and Sandra did in fact visit with Michael Jackson two times, once at the recording studio, and once at his home in the last two months, as recently as three weeks ago, asking for prayer concerning the anointing of the Holy Spirit, and how he could make his music more ‘spiritual.’ So Andrae and Sandra explained to him about the anointing and about Jesus. He wanted to know what makes your hands go up, and makes you ‘come out of yourself,’ and what gives a ‘spirituality’ to the music? He then requested to hear his favorite song that he loves and wanted the(m) to sing to him, so they … joined hands and sang together, and he said, ‘It was beautiful.’ He first heard it in New York, and loved it and wanted it on tape. He had the engineer tape the song sang to him by Andrae and Sandra. He definitely had an encounter with them.”
Was there evidence of a conversion?

The Crouch spokesman said: “He did NOT reject Jesus or the prayer when (we) prayed, and gladly joined in prayer. He usually doesn’t touch anybody, but he touched them, and held their hands in a circle as they sang and prayed. There was NO actual ‘sinners prayer’ however, but they did talk and pray about Jesus and the anointing of the Holy Spirit. They also told him, ‘Michael, we consider you as our son,’ and he said, ‘Yes, yes, yes’ and gave him his latest music on a CD, and he told him, ‘Andrae I trust you with this,’ and gave him CDs of 2 songs … unpublished, beautiful music.”
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=a98e03d9-eccf-4183-b646-8c3e52fe03a7)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=32905972-fca6-473f-825f-c7a9084126d7)
Bill forces shots on all children
Feb 19
Posted by Chris Thomas
FROM WND
Homeschoolers fight state legislation that criminalizes parents who object
By Ron Strom
West Virginia homeschooling families and others were scheduled to stage two rallies today to protest a proposed bill that would require every child in the state to have a record of compulsory immunizations.
The legislation, Senate Bill 439, stipulates “any parent or guardian who refuses to permit his or her child to be immunized” would face a criminal charge.
The rallies, sponsored by West Virginians for Vaccination Exemption, were scheduled to take place at the state Capitol in Charleston and outside the Marion County Courthouse in Fairmont.
“If passed, this bill will turn all West Virginian parents who choose not to vaccinate for religious reasons into criminals or force them to move to another state,” Helen Tucker, co-founder of WVVE and state chair of the Libertarian Party of West Virginia, said in a statement.
Unlike 48 other states, West Virginia currently does not have a provision for a religious or philosophical exemption. However, families can assert they have sufficient medical reason for not immunizing a child, which works, in effect, like an exemption. The new bill would do away with that right.
The legislation, which is sponsored by Sen. Joseph M. Minard and Sen. Roman Prezioso, both Democrats, also adds hepatitis B and chickenpox vaccines to the list of mandatory shots. WVVE says the chickenpox vaccine is manufactured with human cell cultures obtained from abortions and is objectionable to many parents for religious reasons.
Reads the bill, in part: “The state has a compelling interest in protecting the health of all citizens of this state, especially our children. With vaccines widely available to reduce or prevent the incidence of disease, the state bureau for public health has determined that the point of school entry is the best time to confirm each child’s record of compulsory immunization from the diseases enumerated in subsection (c) of this section.”
The bill establishes a fine of between $100 and $500 for any parent who refuses to show the state a valid immunization record for his or her child.
WVVE is demanding the bill be amended to:
The Rev. Thomas J. Euteneuer, president of Human Life International, is also involved in the protest of the bill.
Commented Euteneuer in a statement: “Along with Mississippi, West Virginia is the only state to forbid religious vaccine exemptions. This bill goes even further by prohibiting physicians from granting medical exemptions according to what they believe is best for each patient. Senate Bill 439 would also make West Virginia the only state to force homeschoolers to be immunized.
“It is deplorable that the West Virginia department of health is attempting to mandate these vaccines without an exemption,” said the minister. “State officials have a moral and legal responsibility to uphold parents’ constitutional right to make an informed decision about the medical care their children receive. They’re taking the fruit of the poison tree and making us eat it.”
The Homeschool Legal Defense Association, or HSLDA, opposes the legislation.
Scott Woodruff, an attorney with the organization, explained the bill leaves families with religious or philosophical objections to vaccinations no recourse.
If the bill passes, Woodruff told WND, “There would be no way a family with religious exemptions could defend itself. They would have no way of winning an argument in front of a judge.”
Continued Woodruff, “We are going to communicate to our members that this bill strips parents of important rights.” He says HSLDA will e-mail its members in West Virginia informing them of the proposal.
“This bill would take away a very important right to direct the health care of children,” Woodruff said. “Fundamentally, it’s the parents who should direct the health care of their own children, not the government.”
Woodruff mentioned data from the Centers for Disease Control indicate an exemption from vaccines does not cause a higher occurrence of diseases.
“In areas of preventing disease, we have to give parents wide discretion,” he said.
A second reading of the bill in the state Senate is scheduled for tomorrow. A final vote could occur as early as Thursday.
Technorati : BARACK HUSSAIN OBAMA, BARACK OBAMA, BILL, BREAKING NEWS, CHILDREN, COMMENTARY, DEMOCRATS, FAMILY, HOMESCHOOLERS, HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL, IMMUNIZATION, LATEST NEWS, MEDICINE, NEWS, PARENTS, POLITICS, RELIGION, REV. THOMAS J. EUTENEUER, SCIENCE, SEN. ROMAN PREZIOSO, SEN.JOSEPH M. MINARD, SENATE BILL 439, SHOTS, STATE LEGISLATION, VACCINATION, WEST VIRGINA
Del.icio.us : BARACK HUSSAIN OBAMA, BARACK OBAMA, BILL, BREAKING NEWS, CHILDREN, COMMENTARY, DEMOCRATS, FAMILY, HOMESCHOOLERS, HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL, IMMUNIZATION, LATEST NEWS, MEDICINE, NEWS, PARENTS, POLITICS, RELIGION, REV. THOMAS J. EUTENEUER, SCIENCE, SEN. ROMAN PREZIOSO, SEN.JOSEPH M. MINARD, SENATE BILL 439, SHOTS, STATE LEGISLATION, VACCINATION, WEST VIRGINA
Zooomr : BARACK HUSSAIN OBAMA, BARACK OBAMA, BILL, BREAKING NEWS, CHILDREN, COMMENTARY, DEMOCRATS, FAMILY, HOMESCHOOLERS, HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL, IMMUNIZATION, LATEST NEWS, MEDICINE, NEWS, PARENTS, POLITICS, RELIGION, REV. THOMAS J. EUTENEUER, SCIENCE, SEN. ROMAN PREZIOSO, SEN.JOSEPH M. MINARD, SENATE BILL 439, SHOTS, STATE LEGISLATION, VACCINATION, WEST VIRGINA
Flickr : BARACK HUSSAIN OBAMA, BARACK OBAMA, BILL, BREAKING NEWS, CHILDREN, COMMENTARY, DEMOCRATS, FAMILY, HOMESCHOOLERS, HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL, IMMUNIZATION, LATEST NEWS, MEDICINE, NEWS, PARENTS, POLITICS, RELIGION, REV. THOMAS J. EUTENEUER, SCIENCE, SEN. ROMAN PREZIOSO, SEN.JOSEPH M. MINARD, SENATE BILL 439, SHOTS, STATE LEGISLATION, VACCINATION, WEST VIRGINA
Posted in Family, Latest News, Life, News, Politics, Religion, Science
Leave a Comment
Tags: BARACK HUSSAIN OBAMA, Barack Obama, BILL, Breaking News, CHILDREN, Commentary, Democrats, Family, HOMESCHOOLERS, HUMAN LIFE INTERNATIONAL, IMMUNIZATION, Latest News, MEDICINE, News, PARENTS, Politics, Religion, REV. THOMAS J. EUTENEUER, Science, SEN. ROMAN PREZIOSO, SEN.JOSEPH M. MINARD, SENATE BILL 439, SHOTS, STATE LEGISLATION, VACCINATION, WEST VIRGINA